United States v. Harold Lyons

336 F.2d 1021
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 13, 1964
Docket28676
StatusPublished

This text of 336 F.2d 1021 (United States v. Harold Lyons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Harold Lyons, 336 F.2d 1021 (2d Cir. 1964).

Opinion

336 F.2d 1021

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Harold LYONS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 63, Docket 28676.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 13, 1964.
Decided Oct. 13, 1964.

Appeal from denial of appellant's motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate his sentence, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Herlands, J.

Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., Southern Dist. of New York (William M. Tendy, Jack D. Samuels, Asst. U.S. Attys., of counsel), for appellee.

Harold Lyons, defendant-appellant, pro se.

Before WATERMAN, MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant's motion under 18 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate his sentence is affirmed on Judge Herlands's unreported memorandum opinion below (S.D.N.Y.1963).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
336 F.2d 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harold-lyons-ca2-1964.