United States v. Harold Dean McGraw

503 F.2d 457
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 2, 1974
Docket74-1346
StatusPublished

This text of 503 F.2d 457 (United States v. Harold Dean McGraw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Harold Dean McGraw, 503 F.2d 457 (8th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a timely appeal by defendant McGraw from his conviction and resulting sentence on an indictment charging that he willfully and knowingly possessed a sawed-off shotgun which had not been registered to him in the National Firearms Registration and Trans-, fer Record, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d).'

The only point raised upon appeal is that 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d), as applied to him as a previously convicted felon, is unconstitutional and that it violates his fifth amendment protection against self-incrimination because any attempt to register the firearm would be an admission of guilt of violation of 18 U.S. C. App. § 1202(a)(1) which makes it a crime for a convicted felon to possess a firearm.

This case was consolidated for argument with United States v. Roberts, 503 F.2d 453. Opinion has been filed in that case on this date. Roberts and McGraw were represented by the same counsel. The constitutional attack here made is identical to that made in Roberts. For the reasons stated in Roberts, we reject defendant’s constitutional attack upon § 5861(d) and affirm the conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. John Anthony Roberts
503 F.2d 453 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
503 F.2d 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harold-dean-mcgraw-ca8-1974.