United States v. Harold Ceyes Foster

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Harold Ceyes Foster

401 F.2d 531

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 10, 1968

Docket12313_1

StatusPublished

This text of 401 F.2d 531 (United States v. Harold Ceyes Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Harold Ceyes Foster, 401 F.2d 531 (4th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In a trial to the Court, after waiver of a jury, Harold Ceyes Foster was convicted of failing to report on June 15, 1967 for induction into the military service in compliance with the direction of his Draft Board. 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. We have examined the record in respect to the errors he has assigned on this appeal to the judgment of conviction. None of these points warrant disturbance of the decision of the District Court. The evidence amply warrants the finding of guilt and no error of law is perceived in the trial.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In a trial to the Court, after waiver of a jury, Harold Ceyes Foster was convicted of failing to report on June 15, 1967 for induction into the military service in compliance with the direction of his Draft Board. 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. We have examined the record in respect to the errors he has assigned on this appeal to the judgment of conviction. None of these points warrant disturbance of the decision of the District Court. The evidence amply warrants the finding of guilt and no error of law is perceived in the trial.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

401 F.2d 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harold-ceyes-foster-ca4-1968.