United States v. Harold Bailey McIntyre

442 F.2d 1339, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9813
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 4, 1971·No. 71-1035·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

One issue presented on this appeal from a conviction of passing stolen goods moving in interstate commerce, 18 USCA, § 659, is that evidence obtained as a result of a search following an arrest should have been suppressed on the ground that the requisite probable cause was lacking. The district court held to the contrary and we agree. Bailey v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 386 F.2d 1.

*1340 The other issue rests on a claimed violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694. This claim is without any merit whatever.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harold Bailey McIntyre, 442 F.2d 1339, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9813 (5th Cir. 1971).

442 F.2d 1339 (United States v. Harold Bailey McIntyre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)