United States v. Harold Bailey McIntyre

442 F.2d 1339, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9813
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 1971
Docket71-1035
StatusPublished

This text of 442 F.2d 1339 (United States v. Harold Bailey McIntyre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Harold Bailey McIntyre, 442 F.2d 1339, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9813 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

One issue presented on this appeal from a conviction of passing stolen goods moving in interstate commerce, 18 USCA, § 659, is that evidence obtained as a result of a search following an arrest should have been suppressed on the ground that the requisite probable cause was lacking. The district court held to the contrary and we agree. Bailey v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 386 F.2d 1.

*1340 The other issue rests on a claimed violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694. This claim is without any merit whatever.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
442 F.2d 1339, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harold-bailey-mcintyre-ca5-1971.