United States v. Harold Bailey McIntyre
Opinion
One issue presented on this appeal from a conviction of passing stolen goods moving in interstate commerce, 18 USCA, § 659, is that evidence obtained as a result of a search following an arrest should have been suppressed on the ground that the requisite probable cause was lacking. The district court held to the contrary and we agree. Bailey v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 386 F.2d 1.
*1340 The other issue rests on a claimed violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694. This claim is without any merit whatever.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
442 F.2d 1339 (United States v. Harold Bailey McIntyre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.