United States v. Harl Cole

376 F.2d 848, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6554
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 2, 1967·No. 23564_1·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM;

This suit for damages for personal injury under the Federal Tort Claims Act was decided by the trial court prior to the decision by the United States Su *849 preme Court of United States v. Demko, 385 U.S. 149, 87 S.Ct. 382, 17 L.Ed.2d 258. It is clear that the Demko ease rules this one, in that the appellee was a prisoner whose injuries were incurred in the course of a work activity connected with the maintenance or operation of Maxwell Air Force Base, an institution within which appellee was confined as a civilian prisoner. In such circumstances, the compensation provisions of 18 U.S. C.A. § 4126 were exclusive as to the benefits provided for the appellee in such a situation. The trial court did not have jurisdiction to entertain a Tort Claims Act complaint under such circumstances.

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded with directions that the complaint be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harl Cole, 376 F.2d 848, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6554 (5th Cir. 1967).

376 F.2d 848 (United States v. Harl Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hatfield v. United States
S.D. West Virginia, 2019
Mario Cabello v. United States
427 F. App'x 398 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
White v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.
711 F. Supp. 335 (E.D. Texas, 1989)
Otis F. Aston v. United States
625 F.2d 1210 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Jimmie Otis Wooten v. United States
437 F.2d 79 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
Jewell v. United States
274 F. Supp. 381 (N.D. Georgia, 1967)