United States v. Hargrove

600 F. App'x 101
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 2015
DocketNo. 14-7470
StatusPublished

This text of 600 F. App'x 101 (United States v. Hargrove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hargrove, 600 F. App'x 101 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John E. Hargrove appeals the district court’s order denying various motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hargrove, Case No. 3:07-cr-00058-JPB-JES-l, 2014 WL 4590041 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. .

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
600 F. App'x 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hargrove-ca4-2015.