United States v. Hargrove

922 F.3d 1174
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hargrove. Read the opinion of the Court — 911 F.3d 1306
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2019·No. 18-3194·Unpublished

Opinion

Per Curiam .

This matter is before us on the Motion of the United States for Summary Affirmance. The United States moves for summary affirmance based on this court's recent published decision in United States v. Pullen, 913 F.3d 1270 (10th Cir. 2019), en banc rev. denied April 15, 2019, and the court's earlier decision in United States v. Greer, 881 F.3d 1241 (10th Cir. 2018). While the appellant does not dispute that Greer and Pullen control the outcome of this appeal and does not contest summary affirmance of the district court's judgment, he reserves the right to petition the United States Supreme Court for further review.

In light of the foregoing, the abatement of proceedings in this appeal is lifted, and the appellee's motion for summary affirmance is granted. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hargrove, 922 F.3d 1174 (10th Cir. 2019).

922 F.3d 1174 (United States v. Hargrove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Greer
881 F.3d 1241 (Tenth Circuit, 2018)
United States v. Pullen
913 F.3d 1270 (Tenth Circuit, 2019)