United States v. Hardy
74 M.J. 171, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 1316
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedDecember 3, 2014
DocketNo. 15-0116/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 74 M.J. 171 (United States v. Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Hardy, 74 M.J. 171, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 1316 (Ark. 2014).
Opinion
CCA 20120816. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:
WHETHER IT WAS AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION FOR THE MILITARY JUDGE TO ACCEPT A PLEA OF GUILTY FOR WILLFUL VIOLATION OF A SUPERIOR COMMISSIONED OFFICER IN THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE I DESPITE THE ULTIMATE OFFENSE DOCTRINE AND THE MILITARY JUDGE’S APPLYING THE MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT FOR BREAKING RESTRICTION UNDER ARTICLE 134, UCMJ.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
74 M.J. 171, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 1316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hardy-armfor-2014.