United States v. Harding Troy Kendrick
This text of 462 F.2d 1374 (United States v. Harding Troy Kendrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
462 F.2d 1374
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Harding Troy KENDRICK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-3080.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 1, 1972.
On appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Charles H. Carr, Judge.
Morton L. Shatzkin (argued), Studio City, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Robert C. Bonner, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U. S. Atty., William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this case involving counterfeit currency is affirmed.
Exception is taken to matters involving the trial court's discretion. We find no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
462 F.2d 1374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harding-troy-kendrick-ca9-1972.