United States v. Harden

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Harden

41 F. App'x 659

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2002·No. 02-6487·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Orion Ross Harden appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a *660 certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harden, Nos. CR-97-70099; CA-01-991-7 (W.D.Va. Jan. 7, 2002 & Feb. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Orion Ross Harden appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a *660 certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harden, Nos. CR-97-70099; CA-01-991-7 (W.D.Va. Jan. 7, 2002 & Feb. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Harden, 41 F. App'x 659 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

41 F. App'x 659 (United States v. Harden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related