United States v. Harden
This text of 41 F. App'x 659 (United States v. Harden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orion Ross Harden appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a *660 certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harden, Nos. CR-97-70099; CA-01-991-7 (W.D.Va. Jan. 7, 2002 & Feb. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 F. App'x 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harden-ca4-2002.