United States v. Hanneman
This text of United States v. Hanneman (United States v. Hanneman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT
_________________
No. 00-50446
(Summary Calendar) _________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL JON HANNEMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-00-CR-9-ALL-SS
January 8, 2002 Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Michael Jon Hanneman appeals from his conviction of making false statements to a firearms
dealer and unlawful receipt and possession of a firearm while subject to a restraining order against
committing family violence. Hanneman contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) violates the Second
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Amendment and the Commerce Clause. Section 922(g)(8) does not violate the Second Amendment,
United States v. Emerson, ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. Oct. 16, 2001), 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22386,
*146, nor does it violate the Commerce Clause. United States v. Pierson, 139 F.3d 501, 503-04 (5th
Cir. 1998).
AFFIRMED.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Hanneman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hanneman-ca5-2002.