United States v. Hanneman

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 00-50446

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL JON HANNEMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-00-CR-9-ALL-SS

January 8, 2002

Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Michael Jon Hanneman appeals from his conviction of making false statements to a firearms dealer and unlawful receipt and possession of a firearm while subject to a restraining order against committing family violence. Hanneman contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) violates the Second

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Amendment and the Commerce Clause. Section 922(g)(8) does not violate the Second Amendment, United States v. Emerson, ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. Oct. 16, 2001), 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22386, *146, nor does it violate the Commerce Clause. United States v. Pierson, 139 F.3d 501, 503-04 (5th Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED.