United States v. Hanneman

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 9, 2002
Docket00-50446
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Hanneman (United States v. Hanneman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hanneman, (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 00-50446

(Summary Calendar) _________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL JON HANNEMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-00-CR-9-ALL-SS

January 8, 2002 Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Jon Hanneman appeals from his conviction of making false statements to a firearms

dealer and unlawful receipt and possession of a firearm while subject to a restraining order against

committing family violence. Hanneman contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) violates the Second

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Amendment and the Commerce Clause. Section 922(g)(8) does not violate the Second Amendment,

United States v. Emerson, ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. Oct. 16, 2001), 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22386,

*146, nor does it violate the Commerce Clause. United States v. Pierson, 139 F.3d 501, 503-04 (5th

Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Pierson
139 F.3d 501 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Hanneman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hanneman-ca5-2002.