United States v. Hanna

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hanna

532 F. App'x 367

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 10, 2013

DocketNo. 12-7271

StatusPublished

This text of 532 F. App'x 367 (United States v. Hanna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Hanna, 532 F. App'x 367 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Darry Hanna appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hanna’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hanna, No. 4:06-cr-00828-TLW-2 (D.S.C. July 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Darry Hanna appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hanna’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hanna, No. 4:06-cr-00828-TLW-2 (D.S.C. July 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

532 F. App'x 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hanna-ca4-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack