United States v. Hankins
580 F. App'x 189
Opinion
Wade Temple Hankins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for jail credit on his federal sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hankins, No. 7:05-cr-00025-F-l (E.D.N.C. Jan. 16, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [190] court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Hankins, 580 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2014).
580 F. App'x 189 (United States v. Hankins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.