United States v. Handy

393 F. App'x 985
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Handy. Read the opinion of the Court — 419 F. App'x 380
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 2, 2010·No. No. 10-6607·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William L. Handy, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion Requesting Release on Bail Pending Resolution of Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C.[A.] § 2255 [ (West Supp.2010) ] Motion Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b) [ (2006) ] and the Court’s Inherent Power.” Our review reveals that the district court recently denied Handy’s § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the relief Handy seeks is no longer available, we dismiss his appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Handy, 393 F. App'x 985 (4th Cir. 2010).

393 F. App'x 985 (United States v. Handy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related