United States v. Hampton

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hampton

111 F. App'x 196

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 25, 2004

DocketNo. 04-7002

StatusPublished

This text of 111 F. App'x 196 (United States v. Hampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Hampton, 111 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Marion Hampton appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hampton, No. CR-00-616 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 22, 2004 & entered Apr. 24, 2004; May 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Marion Hampton appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hampton, No. CR-00-616 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 22, 2004 & entered Apr. 24, 2004; May 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 F. App'x 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hampton-ca4-2004.