United States v. Hampton

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hampton

111 F. App'x 196

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2004·No. No. 04-7002·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Marion Hampton appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hampton, No. CR-00-616 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 22, 2004 & entered Apr. 24, 2004; May 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Marion Hampton appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hampton, No. CR-00-616 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 22, 2004 & entered Apr. 24, 2004; May 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Hampton, 111 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

111 F. App'x 196 (United States v. Hampton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.