United States v. Hammel

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Hammel

175 F. App'x 786

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 17, 2006·No. No. 05-1601·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Floyd and Rose Hammel appeal the district court’s¹ in rem judgment and decree of foreclosure granting summary judgment in favor of the government. We have carefully reviewed the record and consid[787]*787ered the parties’ arguments, and find no basis for overturning the district court’s well-reasoned opinion. See ARE Sikeston Ltd. P’ship v. Weslock Nat’l, Inc., 120 F.3d 820, 827 (8th Cir.1997) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Floyd and Rose Hammel appeal the district court’s¹ in rem judgment and decree of foreclosure granting summary judgment in favor of the government. We have carefully reviewed the record and consid[787]*787ered the parties’ arguments, and find no basis for overturning the district court’s well-reasoned opinion. See ARE Sikeston Ltd. P’ship v. Weslock Nat’l, Inc., 120 F.3d 820, 827 (8th Cir.1997) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

United States v. Hammel, 175 F. App'x 786 (8th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

175 F. App'x 786 (United States v. Hammel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.