United States v. Hamm

644 F.2d 354
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 23, 1981
DocketNos. 80-1315, 80-1331
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 644 F.2d 354 (United States v. Hamm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hamm, 644 F.2d 354 (5th Cir. 1981).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 2, 1981, 5 Cir., 638 F.2d 823)

Before BROWN, COLEMAN, AINS-WORTH, CHARLES CLARK, GEE, RUBIN, GARZA, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court’s own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
644 F.2d 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hamm-ca5-1981.