United States v. Hamm

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Hamm

644 F.2d 354

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 23, 1981·No. Nos. 80-1315, 80-1331·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 2, 1981, 5 Cir., 638 F.2d 823)

Before BROWN, COLEMAN, AINS-WORTH, CHARLES CLARK, GEE, RUBIN, GARZA, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court’s own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 2, 1981, 5 Cir., 638 F.2d 823)

Before BROWN, COLEMAN, AINS-WORTH, CHARLES CLARK, GEE, RUBIN, GARZA, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court’s own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

United States v. Hamm, 644 F.2d 354 (5th Cir. 1981).

Pincite

644 F.2d 354 (United States v. Hamm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related