United States v. Hamilton
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v. Criminal No. 06cr200-01 (CKK)
(Civil Action No. 14-948)
ADAM K. HAMILTON,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER (August 24, 2015)
Presently before the Court is Defendant Adam Hamilton’s [57] Motion Under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence. Mr. Hamilton, who was originally proceeding pro se, requests that the Court reconsider and reduce his sentence on the basis that he was improperly designated as an armed career criminal under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”). On June 8, 2015, the Court entered an [74] Order appointing Steven R. Kiersh, Esq., to represent Mr. Hamilton with respect to his § 2255 motion and ordering additional briefing on the sole claim for relief in his motion.
On August 24, 2015, the government filed a [80] response to Mr. Hamilton’s supplemental brief indicating that in light of the Supreme Court of the United States’ holding in Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), and based on the particular facts of this case, “the United States no longer will argue that defendant was properly sentenced to a 15-year prison term pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1).” Govt.’s Resp. to Supp. to § 2255 Mot. at 3. As such, the brief indicates that “the Court should vacate defendant’s 15-year prison sentence and set this matter down for a hearing to impose a prison sentence of not more than ten years, as authorized
by 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2).” Id. at 1. Furthermore, the brief indicates that Mr. Hamilton’s counsel “favors setting an early status date and a further date of a re-sentencing,” as requested by the government. For the reasons described above, the Court GRANTS Adam Hamilton’s [57] Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, as conceded by the Government, and DENIES AS MOOT Adam Hamilton’s [77] Motion to Treat Argument Pertaining to the Residual Clause as Conceded. The Court shall by separate order set a status hearing date. At the status hearing, the Court shall set a re-sentencing date for Mr. Hamilton.
Accordingly, it is this 24th day of August, 2015, hereby ORDERED that Adam Hamilton’s [57] Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence is GRANTED as conceded by the government; and it is further ORDERED that Adam Hamilton’s [77] Motion to Treat Argument Pertaining to the Residual Clause as Conceded is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
This is a final appealable order.
/s/
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Hamilton (United States v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.