United States v. Hamilton

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

United States v. Hamilton

157 F. 569, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4827

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 157 F. 569 (United States v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Hamilton, 157 F. 569, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4827 (circtsdny 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

CHATFlEED, District Judge.

The demurrers will be overruled. As to count 2, the charge is that the defendant knowingly and unlawfully represented himself to be a citizen-of the United States without having been duly admitted. This charge is plainly not properly made upon the facts shown. While good in form, it is inconsistent with the situation shown by the other counts. The order of the court, the accompanying affidavits, and the certificate of citizenship were regular in form, and, until vacated and set aside, cannot be attacked collaterally, even on a criminal charge. The defendant is a citizen so far as his papers go, and these papers were “duly” obtained so far as their form is concerned. The provisions of section 5438, Rev. St. [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p.3670], do not meet the situation shown in the count. The word “duly” applies to regularity and compliance with requirements, rather than to the truth of the facts set forth.

Count 2 should be dismissed, and as to counts 1 and 3 the defendant must plead; but may have a bill of particulars as to the illegal use.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHATFlEED, District Judge.

The demurrers will be overruled. As to count 2, the charge is that the defendant knowingly and unlawfully represented himself to be a citizen-of the United States without having been duly admitted. This charge is plainly not properly made upon the facts shown. While good in form, it is inconsistent with the situation shown by the other counts. The order of the court, the accompanying affidavits, and the certificate of citizenship were regular in form, and, until vacated and set aside, cannot be attacked collaterally, even on a criminal charge. The defendant is a citizen so far as his papers go, and these papers were “duly” obtained so far as their form is concerned. The provisions of section 5438, Rev. St. [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p.3670], do not meet the situation shown in the count. The word “duly” applies to regularity and compliance with requirements, rather than to the truth of the facts set forth.

Count 2 should be dismissed, and as to counts 1 and 3 the defendant must plead; but may have a bill of particulars as to the illegal use.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 F. 569, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hamilton-circtsdny-1907.