United States v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2026·No. 25-30136·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 25-30136 Document: 78-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/27/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 25-30136

FILED

February 27, 2026

Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Michael Hamilton,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:23-CR-197-1

Before Jones, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Michael Hamilton has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed an original and a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hamilton has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 25-30136 Document: 78-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/27/2026

No. 25-30136

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hamilton, (5th Cir. 2026).

United States v. Hamilton (United States v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)