United States v. Hamilton
This text of United States v. Hamilton (United States v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 25-30136 Document: 78-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/27/2026
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 25-30136 FILED February 27, 2026 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Michael Hamilton,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:23-CR-197-1 ______________________________
Before Jones, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Michael Hamilton has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed an original and a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hamilton has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-30136 Document: 78-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/27/2026
No. 25-30136
reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Hamilton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hamilton-ca5-2026.