United States v. Hamilton
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-31087 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHAD A. HAMILTON, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:04-CR-31-ALL --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Chad A. Hamilton has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hamilton has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the record and
counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Hamilton (United States v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.