United States v. Ham
This text of 160 F.2d 738 (United States v. Ham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have examined the briefs and the record in this case. The evidence was sufficient to warrant submitting the case to the jury and to support the verdict. The exclusion of exhibit No. D-3 for identification was not prejudicial error. While the question and the remark of the Assistant United States Attorney, objected to by the defendant, were improper, they were not of such a character as to affect seriously the fairness of the proceedings. The motions for mistrial were properly denied. The trial judge’s charge was adequate and fair.
Accordingly the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 F.2d 738, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ham-ca3-1947.