United States v. Ham

Third Circuit

United States v. Ham

160 F.2d 738, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2667

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 12, 1947·No. No. 9256·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the briefs and the record in this case. The evidence was sufficient to warrant submitting the case to the jury and to support the verdict. The exclusion of exhibit No. D-3 for identification was not prejudicial error. While the question and the remark of the Assistant United States Attorney, objected to by the defendant, were improper, they were not of such a character as to affect seriously the fairness of the proceedings. The motions for mistrial were properly denied. The trial judge’s charge was adequate and fair.

Accordingly the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the briefs and the record in this case. The evidence was sufficient to warrant submitting the case to the jury and to support the verdict. The exclusion of exhibit No. D-3 for identification was not prejudicial error. While the question and the remark of the Assistant United States Attorney, objected to by the defendant, were improper, they were not of such a character as to affect seriously the fairness of the proceedings. The motions for mistrial were properly denied. The trial judge’s charge was adequate and fair.

Accordingly the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

United States v. Ham, 160 F.2d 738, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2667 (3d Cir. 1947).

Pincite

160 F.2d 738 (United States v. Ham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.