United States v. Hallgren
This text of 22 F. App'x 920 (United States v. Hallgren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Michael Carl Hallgren appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Hallgren’s attorney has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issues.
Because our independent review of the record discloses no arguable issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F. App'x 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hallgren-ca9-2002.