United States v. Hall

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 4, 1998·No. 98-6940·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6940

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANDRÉ TERRY HALL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-92, CA-97-745-R)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Richard Nordman, Westerville, Ohio; Malcolm McLeod Doubles, Salem, Virginia, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

André T. Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reinstate his 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Hall, Nos. CR-94-92, CA-97-745-R (W.D. Va. June 9, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hall, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Hall (United States v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related