United States v. Hall

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Hall

714 F. App'x 966

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 28, 2018·No. No. 17-13026 Non-Argument Calendar·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Hughes, appointed counsel for Yvonne Hall in this criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hall’s sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

William Hughes, appointed counsel for Yvonne Hall in this criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hall’s sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Hall, 714 F. App'x 966 (11th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

714 F. App'x 966 (United States v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related