United States v. Hall

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Hall

676 F. App'x 909

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 20, 2017·No. No. 15-12842·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Rivers, appointed counsel for Scott Anderson Hall, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of'merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hall’s convictions and total sentence are AFFIRMED,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert Rivers, appointed counsel for Scott Anderson Hall, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of'merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hall’s convictions and total sentence are AFFIRMED,

United States v. Hall, 676 F. App'x 909 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

676 F. App'x 909 (United States v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related