United States v. Hall
This text of 292 F. App'x 862 (United States v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Sharon Sherman Hall, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s finding that Hall violated the terms of her supervised release, along with her modified monthly restitution payment amount, are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
292 F. App'x 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hall-ca11-2008.