United States v. Hal C. Honegger

57 F.3d 1071, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21002, 1995 WL 330649
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 31, 1995
Docket94-4010
StatusPublished

This text of 57 F.3d 1071 (United States v. Hal C. Honegger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hal C. Honegger, 57 F.3d 1071, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21002, 1995 WL 330649 (6th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

57 F.3d 1071
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Hal C. HONEGGER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-4010.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 31, 1995.

Before BROWN, KENNEDY and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Hal Honegger, appeals from the order of the district court denying his motion for a writ of error coram nobis.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in denying defendant's motion.

As the reasons why the writ should not have been issued have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a full written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose.

Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning set out by that court in its opinion and order filed on September 9, 1994.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 F.3d 1071, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21002, 1995 WL 330649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hal-c-honegger-ca6-1995.