United States v. Hairston
This text of United States v. Hairston (United States v. Hairston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7588
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JIMMY LEE HAIRSTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-398-A)
Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999
Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmy Lee Hairston, Appellant Pro Se. Grace Y. Chung Becker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Lee Hairston appeals the district court’s order denying
his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United
States v. Hairston, No. CR-90-398-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 1998). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Hairston, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hairston-ca4-1999.