United States v. Haire

89 F. App'x 280
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMarch 15, 2004
DocketNo. 03-3049
StatusPublished

This text of 89 F. App'x 280 (United States v. Haire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Haire, 89 F. App'x 280 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed. As the August 14, 2001 transcript shows, the superseding indictment in appellant’s criminal case was returned to the magistrate judge in open court by the foreperson of the jury in accordance with of Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(f).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 F. App'x 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-haire-cafc-2004.