United States v. Hailey

118 U.S. 233, 6 S. Ct. 1049, 30 L. Ed. 173, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1926
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 10, 1886
Docket219
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 118 U.S. 233 (United States v. Hailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hailey, 118 U.S. 233, 6 S. Ct. 1049, 30 L. Ed. 173, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1926 (1886).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case has been docketed here as an appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Idaho, but, on looking into the transcript, we find that the suit was at law and the trial by a jury. Under such circumstances the only proper way of bringing it here for review would have been by writ of error. Stringfellow v. Cain, 99 U. S. 610; United States v. Railroad Co. 105 U. S. 263; Hecht v. Boughton, 105 U. S. 235; Woolf v. Hamilton, 108 U. S. 15. In point of fact, however, there has been neither a writ of error, nor an appeal, nor a citation, nor an appearance by the defendant or respondent. It is clear, therefore, we have no jurisdiction, -and the case is

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex parte France
95 N.E. 515 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1911)
Behn, Meyer & Co. v. Campbell & Go Tauco
205 U.S. 403 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Muhlenberg County v. Dyer
65 F. 634 (Sixth Circuit, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 U.S. 233, 6 S. Ct. 1049, 30 L. Ed. 173, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hailey-scotus-1886.