United States v. Hagstrom
74 M.J. 78, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 1085
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedNovember 6, 2014
DocketNo. 14-0650/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 74 M.J. 78 (United States v. Hagstrom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Hagstrom, 74 M.J. 78, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 1085 (Ark. 2014).
Opinion
CCA 20121058. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:
[79]*79WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY ACCEPTING APPELLANT’S PLEAS OF GUILT TO DISOBEYING THE ORDER OF HIS COMMANDER IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 90, UCMJ, WHEN THE ULTIMATE OFFENSES AT ISSUE WERE THE MINOR OFFENSES OF RESTRICTION BREAKING DESCRIBED UNDER ARTICLE 134, UCMJ, AND THE RECORD DOES NOT REFLECT APPELLANT’S UNDERSTANDING THAT THE ORDER IMPOSING RESTRICTION WAS ISSUED WITH THE FULL AUTHORITY OF HIS COMMANDER’S OFFICE TO LIFT THE DUTY “ABOVE THE COMMON RUCK.”
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
74 M.J. 78, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 1085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hagstrom-armfor-2014.