United States v. Haggerty

495 U.S. 902, 110 S. Ct. 1920
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 23, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1434
StatusPublished

This text of 495 U.S. 902 (United States v. Haggerty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Haggerty, 495 U.S. 902, 110 S. Ct. 1920 (1990).

Opinion

D. C. W. D. Wash. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 494 U. S. 1063.] Motion of appellee Darius Strong for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted. Motion for appointment of counsel [903]*903granted, and it is ordered that Charles S. Hamilton III, Esq., of Seattle, Wash., be appointed to serve as counsel for appellee Darius Strong in this case for the purpose of filing a brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
495 U.S. 902, 110 S. Ct. 1920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-haggerty-scotus-1990.