United States v. Hagen

349 F. App'x 896
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 14, 2009
Docket07-20798
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 349 F. App'x 896 (United States v. Hagen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hagen, 349 F. App'x 896 (5th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: **

On May 31, 2007, Reginald Keith Hagen was charged with possession of firearms *897 and making false statements or representations to a licensed firearms dealer in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(9), 924(a)(2), 922(a)(6); 924(a)(2) and 924(a)(1)(A). The government alleged that Hagen had been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, and as a result made a false statement on ATF Form 4473 in order to purchase two firearms.

Hagen moved to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that he was convicted for “assault of a family member” under Texas Penal Code § 22.01(a)(1) and (b)(2) which he argues does not qualify as a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(A). The district court granted the motion. The district court relied on this court’s ruling in United States v. Villegas-Hemandez, 1 in deciding to not follow United States v. Shelton. 2 We agree with the district court and AFFIRM the dismissal of the indictment.

**

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *897 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. 468 F.3d 874 (5th Cir.2006).

2

. 325 F.3d 553 (5th Cir.2003).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hagen
178 L. Ed. 2d 314 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
349 F. App'x 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hagen-ca5-2009.