United States v. Hade

N.D. Ohio

United States v. Hade

26 F. Cas. 62

DecidedJuly 1, 1877

StatusPublished

This text of 26 F. Cas. 62 (United States v. Hade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Hade, 26 F. Cas. 62 (N.D. Ohio 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

On motion to ouash an information for abstracting and misapplying funds of a national bank, held, that the charge of misapplying the funds of a national bank by its cashier is a charge of an “infamous crime,” which, under the. constitution of the United States, must be instituted by indictment of a grand jury, and cannot be prosecuted by a mere information filed by the district attorney with the assent of the court. The information was quashed.

[Decided by

WELKER, District Judge.

No-, where reported; the opinion filed in clerk’s office. The statement of the points determined was taken from 10 Chi. Leg. News, 22.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On motion to ouash an information for abstracting and misapplying funds of a national bank, held, that the charge of misapplying the funds of a national bank by its cashier is a charge of an “infamous crime,” which, under the. constitution of the United States, must be instituted by indictment of a grand jury, and cannot be prosecuted by a mere information filed by the district attorney with the assent of the court. The information was quashed.

[Decided by

WELKER, District Judge.

No-, where reported; the opinion filed in clerk’s office. The statement of the points determined was taken from 10 Chi. Leg. News, 22.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 F. Cas. 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hade-ohnd-1877.