United States v. Guzman-Reyes

134 F. App'x 758
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Guzman-Reyes. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 F. App'x 607
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2005·No. 03-51199·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Luis Guzman-Reyes (Guzman) appeals his sentence from a guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846. Guzman argues that the district court committed clear error by failing to grant him a downward departure based upon § 5C1.2 of the Sentencing Guidelines.

This court reviews a district court’s refusal to apply the safety-valve provision, based on factual findings, for clear error. See United States v. Ridgeway, 321 F.3d 512, 516 (5th Cir.2003); see also United States v. Angeles-Mendoza, 407 F.3d 742, 753 (5th Cir.2005). The district court denied Guzman a downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2 based upon Guzman’s inconsistent answers over the course of numerous interviews with federal agents. The record supports the district court’s finding that Guzman was ineligible for a sentencing reduction under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(5). See Ridgeway, 321 F.3d at 516; see also Angeles-Mendoza, 407 F.3d at 753.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Guzman-Reyes, 134 F. App'x 758 (5th Cir. 2005).

134 F. App'x 758 (United States v. Guzman-Reyes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ridgeway
321 F.3d 512 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Angeles-Mendoza
407 F.3d 742 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)