United States v. Guzman-Majano

234 F. App'x 273
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 11, 2007
Docket06-51432
StatusUnpublished

This text of 234 F. App'x 273 (United States v. Guzman-Majano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Guzman-Majano, 234 F. App'x 273 (5th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Suyapa Guzman-Majano raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir.2000), which held that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), did not render 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) unconstitutional on its face. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Slaughter
238 F.3d 580 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 F. App'x 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-guzman-majano-ca5-2007.