United States v. Gutierrez-Perez
This text of 269 F. App'x 645 (United States v. Gutierrez-Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Victor Gutierrez-Perez appeals from the 63-month sentence imposed following his bench-trial conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Gutierrez-Perez contends that the district court improperly applied a sixteen-level upward adjustment based on a prior Oregon felony conviction because he was denied a counseled hearing in Oregon court to determine whether his case should be transferred to the adult system. This contention fails because Gutierrez-Perez is not entitled to collaterally attack his prior conviction. See United States v. Gutierrez-Cervantez, 132 F.3d 460, 462 (9th Cir. 1997).
Gutierrez-Perez also contends that his sentence is unreasonable. We conclude that Gutierrez-Perez’s sentence is reasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597-98, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 F. App'x 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gutierrez-perez-ca9-2008.