United States v. Gutierrez-Padilla
263 F. App'x 598
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). [599]*599Accordingly, respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Gutierrez-Padilla, 263 F. App'x 598 (9th Cir. 2008).
263 F. App'x 598 (United States v. Gutierrez-Padilla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)