United States v. Gurney

26 F. Cas. 58, 1 Wash. C. C. 446

This text of 26 F. Cas. 58 (United States v. Gurney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gurney, 26 F. Cas. 58, 1 Wash. C. C. 446 (circtdpa 1806).

Opinion

BV THE COURT.

The replication is certainly double, as either non-payment on the day, or non-acceptance in satisfaction, is an answer to the plea, though perhaps not a legal one; but if not so. both together cannot be. They are perfectly distinct matters, 'and not the component parts of a plea. But, as this determination would require us to decide upon the validity of the bar set up to the plea, which is attended with great difficulty, we think it best to adjourn the cause to the supreme court, upon a disagreement of the judges; which, however, is not real.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 F. Cas. 58, 1 Wash. C. C. 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gurney-circtdpa-1806.