United States v. Gunnings

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 31, 2011·No. 11-6322·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6322

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JAMES ARNOLD GUNNINGS, JR.,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:04-cr-00014-1)

Submitted: May 20, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Arnold Gunnings, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Arnold Gunnings, Jr., a federal prisoner,

appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for

relief from the decision of the Bureau of Prisons to deny him

nunc pro tunc designation. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See United States v. Gunnings,

No. 5:04-cr-00014-1 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2011). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gunnings, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Gunnings (United States v. Gunnings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.