United States v. Gunn

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gunn. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 F.3d 728
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 9, 1996·No. 95-50874·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50874 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BUDDY RAY GUNN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-93-CR-34 - - - - - - - - - - June 21, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Buddy Ray Gunn appeals from the district court's denial of

his motion for a new trial, filed pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.

33. He contends that the district court abused its discretion by

denying his motion without a hearing, as he presented newly

discovered evidence that was material and which would probably

have resulted in either his acquittal or the mitigation of his

sentence. The district court did not abuse its discretion by

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-50874 - 2 -

denying the motion without a hearing as review of the evidence

demonstrates that it was not material and would not have changed

the result of Gunn’s trial or sentence. See United States v.

MMR Corp., 954 F.2d 1040, 1046-47 (5th Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gunn, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Gunn (United States v. Gunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mmr Corp. And James B. Rutland
954 F.2d 1040 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)