United States v. Gundry

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gundry

605 F. App'x 210

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2015·No. No. 15-6095·Published

Opinion

[211] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Devin Gundry appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We find no abuse of direction. See United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir.2013). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument will not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[211] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Devin Gundry appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We find no abuse of direction. See United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir.2013). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument will not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Gundry, 605 F. App'x 210 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

605 F. App'x 210 (United States v. Gundry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related