United States v. Gundry
This text of 605 F. App'x 210 (United States v. Gundry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[211]*211Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Devin Gundry appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We find no abuse of direction. See United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir.2013). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument will not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
605 F. App'x 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gundry-ca4-2015.