United States v. Guillory

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Guillory. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 F. App'x 175
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 17, 2002·No. 01-40136·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40136 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HARRY GUILLORY, JR.,

Defendant- Appellant. ---------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-25-ALL ---------------------------------------------------------- July 11, 2002

Before JOLLY, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Harry Guillory, Jr., on appeal has

requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Guillory has not responded to the motion. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is dismissed from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-40136 -2-

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Guillory, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Guillory (United States v. Guillory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)