United States v. Guidry

156 F. App'x 685
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Guidry. Read the opinion of the Court — 406 F.3d 314
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 7, 2005·No. 05-30028·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Steven Joseph Guidry was convicted following a guilty plea to one count of possessing stolen firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j). He argues that the district court erred by imposing a sentence under a mandatory federal sentencing guideline scheme, which was held to be unconstitutional in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The Government concedes that the issue was preserved in the district court, that the district court committed error, and that it cannot prove that *686 the error was harmless. In light of the foregoing, we VACATE the district court’s sentence and REMAND for resentencing in accordance with Booker.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Guidry, 156 F. App'x 685 (5th Cir. 2005).

156 F. App'x 685 (United States v. Guidry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)