United States v. Guevara-Sorto

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 23, 2010·No. 07-10342·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 23 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 07-10342

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. CR-06-00487-SMM

v. MEMORANDUM * JOSE GONZALO GUEVARA-SORTO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 29, 2010 **

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Gonzalo Guevara-Sorto appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 96-

month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1326(a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Guevara-Sorto’s

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. The appellant has submitted a pro se

supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

The appellant’s motion to file the late supplemental brief is GRANTED.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

2 07-10342

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Guevara-Sorto, (9th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Guevara-Sorto (United States v. Guevara-Sorto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)