United States v. Guerrero-Ortiz

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 12, 2022·No. 21-20191·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 21-20191 Document: 00516505605 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/12/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 21-20191 October 12, 2022 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jesus Guerrero-Ortiz,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CR-573-1

Before Southwick, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Guerrero- Ortiz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guerrero-Ortiz has not filed a response. We have

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-20191 Document: 00516505605 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/12/2022

No. 21-20191

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Guerrero-Ortiz, (5th Cir. 2022).

United States v. Guerrero-Ortiz (United States v. Guerrero-Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)