United States v. Guerrero-Arana
This text of 104 F. App'x 667 (United States v. Guerrero-Arana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM
Counsel has filed a motion pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), to withdraw as counsel. The only possible issue is whether the district court should have departed downward in sentencing.
The district court recognized it had discretion and declined to exercise it. See United States v. Lipman, 133 F.3d 726, 731-32 (9th Cir.1997). There was no error.
The motion to withdraw is granted and the sentence is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 F. App'x 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-guerrero-arana-ca9-2004.