United States v. Guassac

169 F.3d 1188
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 2, 1999·No. Nos. 98-50035, 98-50051·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants contend that the Mesa Grande Band of Mission Indians is not an “Indian Tribal Organization” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1163 and, therefore, that we must reverse their conviction because the district court lacked jurisdiction over them. The Tenth Circuit rejected a [1189]*1189similar claim in United States v. Palmer, 766 F.2d 1441 (10th Cir.1985). We agree with their reasoning and conclude that “federal criminal statutes are applicable uniformly to all tribes within the jurisdiction of Congress.” Id. at 1444. Accordingly, this case was properly brought under 18 U.S.C. § 1163.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Guassac, 169 F.3d 1188 (9th Cir. 1999).

169 F.3d 1188 (United States v. Guassac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. Norton
324 F. Supp. 2d 1067 (N.D. California, 2004)