United States v. Guassac

169 F.3d 1188
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 2, 1999
DocketNos. 98-50035, 98-50051
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 169 F.3d 1188 (United States v. Guassac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Guassac, 169 F.3d 1188 (9th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants contend that the Mesa Grande Band of Mission Indians is not an “Indian Tribal Organization” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1163 and, therefore, that we must reverse their conviction because the district court lacked jurisdiction over them. The Tenth Circuit rejected a [1189]*1189similar claim in United States v. Palmer, 766 F.2d 1441 (10th Cir.1985). We agree with their reasoning and conclude that “federal criminal statutes are applicable uniformly to all tribes within the jurisdiction of Congress.” Id. at 1444. Accordingly, this case was properly brought under 18 U.S.C. § 1163.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. Norton
324 F. Supp. 2d 1067 (N.D. California, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 F.3d 1188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-guassac-ca9-1999.