United States v. Guardiola

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Guardiola

280 F. App'x 375

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Guardiola. Read the opinion of the Court — 236 F. App'x 93 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2008·No. 07-20892·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Andres Guardiola presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the *376 judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Andres Guardiola presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the *376 judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Guardiola, 280 F. App'x 375 (5th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

280 F. App'x 375 (United States v. Guardiola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related